A 9-year-old patient was referred following emergency treatment at another office for a fractured maxillary left central incisor (tooth No. 9). Initial records included clinical photography, necessary radiographs, and an intraoral digital scan. Evaluation of black and white photographs revealed lower value in the gingival one half of the tooth, raising the possibility of early pulpal degradation. An endodontic assessment indicated that root canal therapy was not needed at this time, although it might be required in the future. A conservative direct composite restoration was planned. A single-tooth wax-up guided the restorative design. The previous composite build-up was removed, and the facial surface was beveled in three planes to maximize the bonding surface area and facilitate a seamless blend with the natural tooth structure. A silicone stent fabricated from the wax-up guided initial lingual enamel placement with composite shade WE (CLEARFIL MAJESTY® ES-2, Kuraray Dental, kuraraydental.com). Layers of A1 dentin (CLEARFIL MAJESTY ES-2) were applied and mamelons were carefully sculpted to recreate natural incisal anatomy. Facial enamel shade WE was then layered over the dentin. Finishing included the use of red articulating paper to map and refine microanatomy. Final polish was completed with a featherlight gray polisher. Postoperative photography confirmed faithful recreation of facial anatomy and the tooth fully restored, with the patient ready to proceed with orthodontic treatment.
KEY TAKEAWAYS
- Layered composite technique using CLEARFIL MAJESTY® ES-2 allows precise recreation of incisal anatomy, mamelons, and natural translucency, delivering esthetic outcomes on par with indirect restorations.
- A silicone stent fabricated from a diagnostic wax-up or 3D-printed model provides a reliable lingual scaffold for enamel placement, ensuring accurate tooth contour and proper incisal length from the outset.
- Three-plane beveling that combines a 45-degree bevel, scalloped bevel, and infinite bevel maximizes bonding surface area and creates invisible margins that blend seamlessly with surrounding natural enamel.
Figure 1
Preoperative view showing fractured maxillary left central incisor in 9-year-old patient. The patient’s mother’s primary concern was the tooth’s compromised appearance and its impact on the child’s developing smile.
Figure 2
Monitoring lowering value on black and white photographs aids early identification of potential pulpal compromise. This black and white view revealed lower value in the gingival half of tooth No. 9; endodontic evaluation indicated no need for immediate root canal therapy. Given the patient’s young age, the desire to preserve tooth structure, and the possibility of future orthodontic treatment, a conservative direct composite restoration was planned.
Figure 3
A single tooth diagnostic wax-up was completed to guide the restorative design and fabricate a lingual silicone stent for composite layering.
Figure 4
After removal of existing composite, the facial surface was beveled in three planes—a 45-degree bevel, scalloped bevel (in yellow), and infinite bevel—to maximize the bonding area.
Figure 5
After the tooth was cleansed with a 2% chlorhexidine antibacterial solution (Consepsis™, Ultradent Products), total-etch was applied facially (as shown) and selective-etch lingually (Select HV® Etch w/BAC, BISCO).
Figure 6
Adhesive (CLEARFIL™ Universal Bond Quick 2, Kuraray Dental) was applied per the manufacturer’s protocol.
Figure 7
Milky white enamel shade composite (CLEARFIL MAJESTY ES-2 WE) was placed into the lingual aspect of the stent to form the palatal shell.
Figure 8
After the stent was removed, revealing the initial lingual enamel layer, a proximal strip (Composi-Tight® M-Series sectional matrix bands, Garrison) was placed to define and establish a proper distal contact point. Flowable composite was used to temporarily hold the matrix.
Figure 9
A1 dentin layer (CLEARFIL MAJESTY ES-2) was placed. Mamelons (in yellow) were carefully sculpted to recreate natural incisal anatomy and characterization.
Figure 10
Facial enamel shade (CLEARFIL MAJESTY ES-2 WE) was layered over dentin to restore facial translucency; gross contour was established at this stage.
Figure 11
Finishing was initiated with medium discs (as shown). Contour and surface texture would be refined with fine diamond instruments.
Figure 12
Further refinement was achieved using points (Enhance®, Dentsply Sirona) to recreate facial lobes.
Figure 13
Red articulating paper was used to map and copy microanatomy from the contralateral tooth (as shown), ensuring symmetrical surface texture and natural light reflection. Final polish would be performed with a featherlight gray polisher for a smooth, high-luster surface with natural enamel-like sheen.
Figure 14
Incisal view confirmed accurate recreation of facial anatomy, proper contour, and seamless margin integration with adjacent natural tooth structure.
Figure 15
Postoperative view showing fractured central incisor fully restored; the patient was approved for continuation of orthodontic treatment.
Figure 16
Postoperative black and white photograph documented the continued monitoring of tooth No. 9 for potential future pulpal compromise and root canal therapy needs due to lower value.
Michael J. Morgan, DDS
Private Practice, Hinsdale, Illinois